Other

Letter to the UN Security Council Members Concerning Darfur, Sudan

On June 29, the day the United Nations Security Council (SC) was to decide whether or not to deploy a UN peacekeeping force to Darfur, Sudan, a coalition of ten human rights, humanitarian and advocacy organizations sent the following letter to the 15 members of the Security Council. The letter urged them to deploy such a force as soon as possible. The letter also asked the SC members to immediately strengthen and reinforce the African Union force currently serving in Darfur, and to increase funding for cash-strapped humanitarian programs.

June 29, 2006

Dear UN Security Council Member _______:

As you meet today to decide the future of a UN peacekeeping operation in Darfur, Sudan, we, members of international human rights and humanitarian organizations, exhort you to deploy a robust, multi-national force at the earliest possible moment.

We address you today with a sense of great urgency. The Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA), signed May 5, 2006 by the Government of Sudan and one of the three rebel groups, did not end that bloody conflict. Violent attacks on civilians continue, and both parties have violated the DPA. The African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS), while performing admirably under difficult circumstances, has had a limited impact on the security situation and is ill-equipped to oversee the multitude of tasks assigned to it under the DPA. Further, there are few signs that AMIS will achieve adequate operational capacity to protect civilians and hold the parties to their obligations under the Agreement.

A United Nations peacekeeping operation, deployed under a Chapter VII mandate and comprising at least 20,000 troops, represents the only hope for ending the violence in Darfur and creating conditions for the safe and voluntary return of refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) to their villages. To this end, we urge your government to take the following steps:

  1. Support and contribute to the deployment of a UN peacekeeping operation of 20,000 troops under Chapter VII no later than October 2006. This force, which should be composed of a substantial contingent of soldiers from Muslim and African nations, will be tasked with protecting civilians and overseeing the security arrangements in the DPA, notably the disarmament of the Janjaweed militias.
    • Countries on the Security Council must use all diplomatic means – including consideration of targeted sanctions – to convince the Sudanese Government to drop its opposition to such a force.
    • The Security Council must return to the original timetable for deployment of UN forces in Darfur by the end of September 2006. Every month is critical; the people of Darfur cannot wait until 2007.
    • Governments must provide operational and technical support to the UN force, including attack helicopters, ground-based radar, strategic and tactical lift and trained personnel to staff the force at headquarters level.
  2. Encourage your home government to immediately reinforce and strengthen the African Union mission until a UN force can be deployed. We urge you to provide additional resources and logistical support to the under-resourced mission, so that it can more effectively protect civilians, and to support the difficult task of disarming the Janjaweed according to DPA timelines.
  3. Significantly increase your funding of humanitarian assistance programs in Darfur, and quickly follow through with provisioning on the ground. Aid agencies are struggling to meet even the most basic needs of the war-affected populations because of funding shortfalls.
  4. Signal to the Government of Sudan that obstruction of humanitarian relief is unacceptable. All obstructions, refusals of visas for aid workers and other delaying tactics will be considered violations of the DPA and will trigger consideration of targeted sanctions.
  5. Hold all parties accountable for their obligations under international human rights and humanitarian law, including those reflected in the DPA. Targeted sanctions against violators should be considered if parties fail to protect civilians and disarm the Janjaweed.

We believe that the UN's appointment of a high-level Envoy for Peace in Sudan would facilitate the above actions, while keeping the situation in Darfur in the public eye. This senior envoy could coordinate closely with donors on humanitarian and development assistance, and exert sustained diplomatic pressure on all parties to abide by their commitments. An envoy also could monitor negotiations between the Government of Sudan and rebels in the east and exert pressure on the parties to adhere to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of January 2005.

We urge you, members of the Security Council, to respond with the requisite urgency.

Sincerely,

Ann-Louise Colgan, Acting Co-Executive Director
Africa Action

Ruth Messinger, Executive Director/President
American Jewish World Service

Gerald LeMelle, Deputy Executive Director
Amnesty International USA

Mark Hanis, Executive Director
Genocide Intervention Network

Peter Takirambudde, Africa Director
Human Rights Watch

Hafiz Mohamed, Sudan Program Director
Justice Africa

Richard Cizik, Vice President for Governmental Affairs
National Association of Evangelicals

Leonard S. Rubenstein, Executive Director
Physicians for Human Rights

Kenneth H. Bacon, President
Refugees International

Ricken Patel, Co-Director
Res Publica

David Rubenstein, Coordinator
Save Darfur Coalition

Erin Mazursky, Executive Director
The National STAND Coalition (Students Taking Action Now: Darfur)

Dr. Jacky Mamou, President
Urgence Darfour (France)

Other

Eight Human Rights and Humanitarian Groups Urge a Leadership Role for the US on Darfur

President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20006

June 5, 2006

Dear President Bush:

As human rights and humanitarian organizations, we are gravely concerned that the hopes raised when the Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA) was signed one month ago today are quickly vanishing. Violations of the Agreement are mounting and missed deadlines are being met with silence from the international community. Understandably, the people of Darfur are losing confidence in this accord, and the parties to the Agreement have little reason to believe they will be pressed to meet their commitments. Far from fulfilling its obligations under the DPA, the Government of Sudan has continued to block humanitarian aid and to deny access to aid organizations and media outlets seeking access to Darfur. The Government arrested human rights lawyers in Darfur within days of signing the accord. As of today, major stakeholders in Darfur have yet to sign the agreement. In addition, key questions of how security and economic opportunity will be provided to those who have lost all they own are not detailed in the document and need to be developed within the framework of the Agreement.

We address you and your administration today with a sense of great urgency. The United States was a key broker of the agreement and is a leading donor of humanitarian assistance funds to agencies assisting the Darfurian people. We appeal to you to engage intensively in the weeks and months ahead to prevent greater bloodshed, displacement and the worsening of the humanitarian crisis in Darfur and in neighboring Chad. Continued US leadership is critical. First, violence must cease – without security, nothing else is possible. Second, the US must increase its efforts to stem the on-going humanitarian crisis. Third, the US must continue to play an active role in laying the groundwork for peace and justice in Darfur. To this end, we urge you to take the following steps:

  1. Support and contribute to the deployment of a UN peacekeeping force of 20,000 troops under Chapter VII no later than October 2006. This force, which should be composed of a substantial contingent of soldiers from Muslim and African nations, will be tasked with protecting civilians and overseeing the security arrangements in the Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA), notably the disarming of the Janjaweed militias and rebel forces. The US should insist that Khartoum accept this force and should encourage other members of the UNSC who are traveling to Darfur next week to do the same.
  2. Strengthen the African Union force (AMIS) by retaining and immediately allocating the $173 million in the FY 2006 supplemental appropriations bill after it is enacted into law. We urge you to provide additional resources and logistical support while simultaneously encouraging the other G8 nations to increase their assistance to the under-resourced force.
  3. Continue to give generously to humanitarian assistance programs in Darfur which are desperately under-funded. The FY 2006 supplemental appropriations bill includes additional funding in humanitarian assistance for the people of Darfur. Currently, US agencies such as the US Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) are borrowing funds from other accounts to meet basic emergency needs in Darfur. Funding must be allocated and dispersed as soon as possible to avoid a stoppage to existing emergency programs. Urge other G8 nations to increase their humanitarian funding, and to quickly make good on their pledges with cash on the ground. At the same time, signal the Government in Khartoum that interference with the delivery of humanitarian aid is unacceptable, and that all obstructions, refusals of visas for aid workers and other delay tactics will be considered violations of the DPA and will trigger targeted sanctions through the UN Security Council.
  4. Rigorously demonstrate US intentions to hold all parties accountable to their obligations under the DPA, particularly regarding implementation of the ceasefire, civilian protection, and disarmament of the Janjaweed. Within the UN Security Council, violations of the DPA and failure to meet agreed- upon deadlines must result in targeted sanctions against individuals obstructing or delaying the process.
  5. Hold the Governments of Sudan and Chad accountable for violating of the terms of the Tripoli Agreement of February 2006, in which both sides pledged to end cross-border attacks. Violations are exacerbating an already-disastrous humanitarian situation; increasing refugee flows between the two countries, and contributing to heightening violence in the volatile border area.
  6. Maintain diplomatic pressure on the Government of Sudan to significantly increase its funding of compensation for victims to build towards a more appropriate figure. The $30 million commitment by the GOS, currently included in the DPA, is an insult to the victims who have sustained great economic and personal losses. For each of the nearly 800,000 families affected to receive even $1,000, which represents a fraction of the losses sustained by most, would require nearly $1 billion. Victim assistance and individual support to rebuild lives and livelihoods is a central demand of all the affected populations and may well be the single most critical issue for securing peace and the rights of the general populace to this form of redress.
  7. Promote accountability by ensuring that all perpetrators are held responsible for their actions through proper judicial processes. Vow that the US will support international, multi-lateral efforts to prosecute those who have committed atrocities in Darfur.

We believe that your full backing and active support for the rapid appointment of a high-level Envoy for Peace in Sudan would facilitate the above actions while demonstrating US leadership. This senior Envoy could coordinate closely with donors on humanitarian and development assistance, exert sustained diplomatic pressure on all parties to abide by their commitments, and work with hold-out rebel groups to encourage them to sign the DPA. An Envoy could also work with donor nations and the UN to monitor negotiations between the Government of Sudan and rebels in the east, to exert pressure on both the Government of Sudan and the rebel groups to adhere to the CPA, and to cut through bureaucratic red tape obstructing US assistance to South Sudan, especially for the SPLA. With Secretary Zoellick's impending departure and the Darfur peace process hanging by a thread, the time is right for this move.

President Bush, we urge you to assume a stronger and more public leadership role on the issue of Darfur, and to exhort the other nations of the world to more fully respond to this ongoing tragedy with the requisite urgency. Time is running out in Darfur. The nations most invested in the Darfur Peace Agreement have a narrow window during which they must prove that they are willing to hold parties to their obligations, and that they are willing to field a UN Force capable of establishing real security. If this crucial period passes without concerted and coordinated US and international action, many tens of thousands more lives will likely be lost.

Sincerely,

Ann-Louise Colgan, Acting Co-Executive Director
Africa Action

Ruth Messinger, Executive Director/President
American Jewish World Service

Mark Hanis, Executive Director
Genocide Intervention Network
Maureen Byrnes, Executive Director
Human Rights First

Kenneth Roth, Executive Director
Human Rights Watch

Erin Mazursky, Executive Director
National STAND (Students Taking Action Now: Darfur) Coalition

Leonard S. Rubenstein, Executive Director
Physicians for Human Rights

David Rubenstein, Coordinator
Save Darfur Coalition

Cc: Vice President Cheney
Secretary Rumsfeld
Secretary Rice
Deputy Secretary Zoellick
Charge d'Affaires Hume
Chairman Lugar
Chairman Hyde

Report

Excluded People, Eroded Communities

Realizing the Right to Health in Chiapas, Mexico

PHR details the devastating impact that the ongoing, low-intensity conflict in Chiapas has had on the health and human rights of its civilians. This household survey is the first comprehensive population-based study to take place in the conflict zone-yielding alarming data on maternal mortality, child health (particularly rates of malnutrition and vaccination coverage), the number of people infected with pulmonary tuberculosis, as well as the overall availability of health services to the population and socio-demographic indicators.

Other

Guide to Using the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to Support Health Systems Strengthening in Round 6

Read the report (pdf)

This Guide is meant to assist members of Country Coordinating Mechanisms and other individuals and organizations involved in preparing proposals, or providing input into these proposals, for Round 6 of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (2006).

Report

Darfur – Assault on Survival

A Call for Security, Justice, and Restitution

In May 2004 and January and July 2005, through collecting eyewitness testimony from dozens of Darfurian refugees in Chad, and finding ample evidence of an organized attempt to destroy non-Arab groups, PHR compiled a composit picture of massive destruction in Darfur.

Report

Break Them Down

Systematic Use of Psychological Torture by US Forces

As evidence of US national security interrogation practices emerged, it became clear that psychologically abusive methods of interrogation were at the core of US intelligence gathering. Break Them Down, published by PHR in May 2005, was the first comprehensive review of the use of psychological torture by US forces, examining the devastating health consequences of psychological coercion and explaining how a regime of psychological torture was put into place in the US “war on terror”.

>> Learn more about the US and Torture

Report

Destroyed Livelihoods

A Case Study of Furawiya Village, Darfur

PHR researchers tell the story of just one of the thousands of villages destroyed in the genocidal campaign waged throughout Darfur. Through interviews with refugees from the village Furawiya, we hear the intimate stories of a people terrorized by Sudan’s government and the Janjaweed.

Learn more about the continuing genocide in Darfur.

Report

The Use of Rape as a Weapon of War in Darfur, Sudan

In the conflict in Darfur, tens of thousands of civilians have been systematically killed, raped, and starved. PHR performed extensive interviews and qualitatively assessed the nature, circumstances and context of rape as a weapon in the nation’s on-going war. This report was prepared for the U.S. Agency for International Development/OTI published through the Program on Humanitarian Crises and Human Rights, of the François-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights at the Harvard School of Public Health, with help from PHR.

>> Learn more about rape as a weapon of war.

Report

HIV Transmission in Health Care Settings

Even as prevention programs aimed at sexual transmission require greater funding, the high risk of HIV transmission in health care settings requires immediate and sustained attention from national and multilateral organizations involved in HIV/AIDS prevention activities. Every year, because of violations of core aspects of the right to health, at least half a million people — and possible many more — contract HIV through unsafe medical injections and blood transfusions.

Report

An Action Plan to Prevent Brain Drain

Building Equitable Health Systems in Africa

This paper addresses a crisis of severe shortages of human resources in heavily impacted sub-Saharan societies where health care workers who have the opportunity to move to wealthier nations do so, thus rejecting substandard, second-class health systems that their countries and the international community have been too slow to upgrade.

Get Updates from PHR