Blog

UN Human Rights Council 54th Session sends Mixed Signals to Perpetrators  

PHR experts were in Geneva to advocate for health, human rights, and accountability for Ethiopia, Syria, and Ukraine.

The 54th session of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) concluded last week with at best mixed results – and certainly mixed signals – regarding the Council’s commitment to health and human rights. Together with national, regional, and international partners, Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) urged Member States and Special Procedures to seek accountability for gross human rights and humanitarian law violations in Ethiopia, Syria, and Ukraine. Across those countries, we saw abdication of responsibility (Ethiopia), stalemate (Syria), and one positive signal (Ukraine), though no progress toward prevention or accountability in any of these crisis situations. 

Ethiopia 

Armed conflict erupted in the Tigray region of Ethiopia in November 2020 between the government of Ethiopia and the Tigray People’s Liberation Front. For the last year, the Human Rights Council’s own independent investigative body, the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia (ICHREE), has asserted “reasonable grounds to believe that all parties to the conflict committed serious violations and abuses, including war crimes and crimes against humanity.” They persist even following the signing of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement almost a year ago.  

PHR and the Organization for Justice and Accountability in the Horn of Africa (OJAH) reviewed 305 medical records from health facilities across Tigray. Our recent joint report documented that survivors experienced sexual violence at the hands of multiple perpetrators – sometimes in the form of sexualized enslavement – and faced significant delays in reporting and seeking medical care. Our findings were consistent with those in ICHREE’s final report, which found that combatants violated international human rights and humanitarian law and bear responsibility for “crimes of rape and sexual violence against women and girls in Tigray.” Survivors of sexual violence, primarily women and girls, who sought care between November 2020 and July 2023 in Tigray alone exceeded 10,000, according to ICHREE.  

Calling the conflict “one of the deadliest of the 21st century,” ICHREE delivered a report and comprehensive investigative findings and legal determinations in this Session, concluding with a clear warning of the “acute risk of further atrocity crimes in Ethiopia.” The UN Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide has also warned of “the continued presence of risk factors for genocide and related atrocity crimes in the country.” 

With this in mind, PHR, OJAH, the Health Professionals Network for Tigray, and other partners spent months advocating with Human Rights Council Member States to call for sustained independent monitoring. Together with Amnesty International and the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute, PHR and partners presented the findings of our research during the interactive dialogue on Ethiopia, side events, and briefings to highlight the urgent need for sustained monitoring and accountability, including the extension of ICHREE’s mandate. 

Yet on October 4, survivors and affected communities in Ethiopia and abroad watched in disbelief as the Council let ICHREE’s mandate lapse. Member States even declined to call for weaker forms of engagement. Not even the European Union, which had called for ICHREE’s creation in the first place, took action to renew it. The resulting lack of sustained independent monitoring will inevitably lead to further impunity and unchecked abuse. The Council’s inaction has effectively eliminated its ability to scrutinize one of the most egregious human rights crises in the world today.  

According to ICHREE, “The vast majority of Ethiopians asked by the Commission about accountability and healing expressed their complete lack of trust in Ethiopian State institutions to carry out a credible process of transitional justice.” Yet, in ICHREE’s place, responsibility devolves to the African Union and the joint investigative team of the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) and the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission. Neither of these mechanisms is sufficiently independent or impartial to ensure accountability. Indeed, the African Union failed to release its own report, effectively silencing itself, and the government of Ethiopia has barred independent monitors from conducting investigations on the ground. 

The Council should be credited for fully extending 14 other thematic and country mandates during this Session and for creating an independent international fact-finding mission on Sudan. But its readiness to ensure investigation of patterns of violations in Sudan but not in neighboring Ethiopia sent mixed messages about the Council’s will to pursue truth-telling and accountability on behalf of all equally. That inconsistent application of its mission risks fueling impunity for similar crimes elsewhere. 

PHR is committed to working with partners to provide ongoing documentation of sexual violence, sexual slavery, and attacks on health care in Ethiopia as the conflict continues.  

Syria 

The 54th Council Session marked the 12th year of reporting on the human rights and humanitarian crisis in Syria through its Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic. As PHR’s report She Pays the Highest Price: The Toll of Conflict on Sexual and Reproductive Health in Northwest Syria documents and the Commission’s new report affirms, the situation in Syria remains dire. Debates and recommendations to the Human Rights Council on the situation in Syria have stagnated; the Commission is merely able to “reiterate” its past demands due to stark political divides among Member States.  

Nonetheless, the Council’s vote to extend the Commission of Inquiry’s mandate for another year signals some commitment to seeing that one of the most entrenched and catastrophic human rights crises in the world remains part of the Council’s docket. Violations committed by the Syrian government with Russian support are still ongoing, with the most recent attack on medical facilities documented a few days ago in northwest Syria. 

Ukraine  

The 54th Session of the Human Rights Council provided scrutiny of ongoing war crimes and crimes against humanity in Ukraine – and, to a degree, the crime of aggression. 

PHR reiterated its calls for prevention and accountability for the pattern of attacks on health care systems and medical professionals since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 in the form of three interventions this session. The first was via PHR’s ongoing engagement with the Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine, which presented an oral update to the Council, and engagement with Member States during the Interactive Dialogue.  

The second was calling for accountability in the context of the UN Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the Russian Federation’s first report to the Council. PHR condemned the more than 1,000 attacks that have been perpetrated against Ukraine’s health care system; called for restitution for the $2.5 billion in damage to health infrastructure; and called out Russia’s policy of “passportization” in the temporarily occupied territories, under which access to health care and essential medicines is restricted to those with Russian passports, jeopardizing the right to health and to life.  

The third intervention was calling on Member States to vote against Russia’s bid for readmission to the Human Rights Council because of its flagrant human rights violations at home and atrocity crimes in Syria, Ukraine, and elsewhere. Together with Ukrainian partners, PHR plans to build on this momentum at the Universal Periodic Review of the Russian Federation in November.   

Widespread human rights abuses persist in Ukraine with near impunity. Although the Commission took tentative steps in this session to condemn violations by the Russian Federation, more sustained efforts to promote accountability are necessary. The Commission of Inquiry’s oral update, following its most recent visit to Ukraine, previewed a strong report next month to the UN General Assembly. The Council secured sustained documentation of Russia’s human rights record by extending the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on Russia for another year. And, perhaps most significantly, the UN General Assembly denied the Russian Federation’s application for renewed membership in the Human Rights Council, extracting a political price for its appalling human rights record.  

It was a reminder of the power the Council can wield when it chooses to. 

Photo: A view of a meeting during the fifty-fourth session of the Human Rights Council. UN Photo/Jean Marc Ferré

Statements

PHR Contributes to International Human Rights Treaty Review of the United States

PHR is in Geneva this week to spotlight evidence of human rights violations in the United States before one of the most wide-ranging international human rights treaties. 

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) touches on a wide array of rights ranging from the freedoms of assembly and expression to freedom from torture to equality under the law. On October 17 and 18, the United States will undergo its next regular review under the ICCPR, which it ratified in 1992. The review will be conducted by the Human Rights Committee (CCPR), the treaty body created to oversee monitoring and reporting on states parties’ compliance with the treaty. While scheduled for every five years, the United States has not undergone a review since 2014, after the process was delayed first by request of the U.S. government and then due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  

The review process is an opportunity to advance PHR’s U.S. advocacy priorities on asylum and immigration detention, U.S. policing reform, and reproductive justice. Among the key advocacy goals are: (1) defending clinicians and their work in a human rights framework; (2) debunking the racist pseudoscience of “excited delirium”; (3) increasing regulation of “less-lethal weapons”; and (4) protecting the right to abortion. 

PHR has engaged in formal submissions consultations, and briefings to confront the U.S. government’s human rights record and support the work of the CCPR. PHR has collaborated with many key U.S. civil society partners to increase our strategic impact throughout the process. 

Today marks the beginning of the two-day formal CCPR review session for the United States, where a delegation of U.S. government officials must respond to questions and concerns raised by the Committee on how the United States has failed to meet its treaty obligations under the ICCPR. The Committee will ultimately issue a series of concluding observations and will recommend reforms for the United States to implement to address the concerns raised during the review.  

Asylum and Immigration Detention  
  
Since the 2014 review, the U.S. asylum system has been drastically undermined by policies, including “Zero Tolerance,” “Migrant Protection Protocols,” “Title 42” and, more recently, the introduction of “Circumvention of Legal Pathways,” all of which create undue barriers to asylum. The physical and legal barriers violate the principles of domestic and international law, and continue to cause significant physical and psychological harm, at times amounting to torture, which PHR has extensively documented.    
 
The U.S. asylum system fundamentally does not support a trauma-informed approach, including a needless reliance on systems of detention. U.S. immigration detention lacks independent oversight, and PHR has documented violations of domestic and international standards of care. While PHR has long supported noncustodial, community-based case management alternatives to immigration detention, we are deeply concerned that new policy initiatives that claim to represent “alternatives to detention,” in fact represent an expansion to the total number of people under some form of government control or surveillance.  

One of the key advocacy goals for the review session will be to guard against further deterioration of the U.S. asylum system and work toward a system that abides by international human rights principles as well as U.S. and international law.  
 

Policing and Use of Force  
  
PHR has extensively reported on the health and human rights impacts of various forms of “less-lethal weapons” used in policing, as well as police use of force in crowd-control settings. In response to racial justice protests in 2020, PHR documented how various law enforcement agencies in cities like Portland and New York indiscriminately deployed crowd-control weapons that caused significant injuries as well as rights abuses. The United States should work to mainstream UN-backed international standards on the use of force, including on the use of crowd-control weapons. Current police standards and oversight mechanisms across much of the United States are insufficient.   

Since publishing a groundbreaking 2022 report, PHR has been campaigning to end the use of the discredited diagnosis known as “excited delirium,” which has been used in a wide range of contexts to deny police accountability for excessive force and deaths in police custody. “Excited delirium” is an unscientific term with racist origins that has become a catch-all explanation for many deaths occurring in the context of law enforcement restraint, often coinciding with mental illness. It has disproportionately been used to explain the deaths of Black men in police encounters. Today, the term lacks support from any major medical association. PHR has concluded that “excited delirium” is not a valid medical or psychiatric diagnosis and should not be used by clinicians, attorneys, or law enforcement.  
  
PHR has also noted that deaths in law enforcement custody, including in-custody deaths wrongly attributed to “excited delirium,” are undercounted across the United States, including by multiple federal agencies. The U.S. Department of Justice must take drastic steps to fulfill its reporting requirements under the 2013 Death in Custody Reporting Act.    

Reproductive Justice 
  
Another goal for the review session will be to re-establish and strengthen federal reproductive health, rights, and justice protections. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization marked the most widespread rollback in the protection of previously recognized constitutional rights in the country’s history. The loss of federal protection for the right to abortion has made access to abortion care much more fragmented and limited across the country and has contributed to a wider chilling effect on reproductive and maternal health. Additionally, abortion bans in restrictive states contribute to a strain on abortion care systems in haven states.   
  
State bans leave clinicians in a situation known as “dual loyalty,” a position where they must navigate arbitrary and punitive state laws while also seeking to comply with their ethical duty to provide the appropriate standard of care for their patients and ensure patient autonomy. In addition to undermining the provision of care, abortion bans undermine providers’ ability to provide — and patient’s ability to access — accurate information from their trusted health care providers about safe and legal abortions.  
  
Prior to Dobbs, Black, indigenous, and Latinx populations already experienced stark inequities in access to reproductive health care in the United States; these disparities are likely to be further exacerbated as abortion access becomes increasingly limited.  

PHR calls on the U.S. federal and state governments to restore and strengthen abortion rights to ensure access without discrimination. PHR further calls on the federal government to adopt legal measures to shield clinicians from prosecution and other penalties for providing safe abortion-related information and care, and to utilize its oversight authority to monitor the impact of abortion bans on the provision of reproductive health care and on health disparities, and the effectiveness of legislative measures. Finally, PHR calls on the U.S. government to meaningfully engage with heightened criminalization and retrogression in abortion rights as a human rights crisis. 

What’s Next? 

After two days of scrutiny and interrogation of the U.S. government delegation on the country’s human rights record, the Committee will issue a series of concluding observations and recommendations at the conclusion of the 139th CCPR session on November 3. These observations and recommendations will inform the U.S. government on steps that need to be taken to bring U.S. policy, law, and practices in line with its international human rights treaty commitments. These obligations under international law will be a critical tool that civil society, the media, activists, and the general public will use to hold the government accountable and advocate for change to advance universal human rights and freedoms in the United States.  

See the full text of the PHR submission here.  

See the full text of the PHR joint submission with CRR, Lift Louisiana and RH Impact here.

Open Letter

PHR to President Erdoğan: End Harassment of Turkish Physician Ayşe Uğurlu

PHR joins the call for the immediate end to ongoing administrative harassment of eminent physician Ayşe Uğurlu and all attempts to silence and punish medical professionals and professional organizations in Türkiye for their defense of human rights.

Open Letter

Joint Statement Urging More Aid, Solidarity and Attention to Sudan Crisis

(New York, September 13, 2023) – We, the heads of over 50 human rights and humanitarian organizations are coming together to sound the alarm about Sudan, where a disaster is unfolding before our eyes. With fighting continuing across the country, brutal sexual violence rising, widespread deliberate and indiscriminate attacks on civilians, and journalists and human rights defenders being silenced, the country is no longer at the precipice of mass atrocities – it has fallen over the edge.

Since April, when open hostilities broke out in Sudan’s capital, more than five million people have been forced to flee their homes and hundreds of thousands of others may soon be forced to join them. Many are now living in camps with limited access to humanitarian assistance, few educational opportunities for their children, and almost no psychosocial support to help them cope with their traumatic experiences.

Inside Sudan, over 20 million people, 42 percent of Sudan’s population, now face acute food insecurity and 6 million are just a step away from famine. At least 498 children have died from hunger. Clinics and doctors have come under fire throughout the country, putting 80 percent of the country’s major hospitals out of service.

Hate speech, especially language urging the targeting of communities based on the color of their skin, is always alarming. But with an increasingly fractured social fabric, some fighters targeting civilians based on their ethnicity, and accounts from sexual violence survivors in Darfur who heard their rapists tell them that we hope you bear “our” babies – we fear the worst.

Twenty years after the horrors of Darfur shocked our conscience, we are failing to meet the moment. Thus far, mediation efforts have not deterred Sudan’s warring parties from continuing to commit egregious abuses. We urge a more unified approach that better represents the voices and perspectives of Sudan’s civilians, including women, youth, and representatives from the historically marginalized “periphery.”

We are committed to working together to urge more aid for, more solidarity with, and greater attention to the needs of Sudan’s civilians. The United Nations humanitarian appeal remains woefully underfunded – at about 25 percent of what is needed – and Sudan’s warring parties continue to undermine efforts to deliver aid safely. Donors should step up humanitarian funding, both for local and international organizations who are providing indispensable assistance in Sudan and neighboring countries.

The costs of inaction are mounting. The UN Security Council should move from talk to action and begin negotiations to pass a resolution that challenges the climate of impunity, reiterates that international law requires providing safe, unhindered humanitarian access, and redirects international efforts to better protect Sudan’s most vulnerable. The consequences of not acting are too grave to imagine.

Signatories (listed alphabetically)

African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies, Mossaad Mohamed Ali, Executive Director

Africans for the Horn of Africa, Stella Ndirangu, Coordinator

Amnesty International, Agnes Callamard, Secretary General

Association of Sudanese-American Professors in America (ASAPA), Beckry Abdel-Magid, Secretary

Atrocities Watch, Dismas Nkunda, CEO

Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, Bahey El Din Hassan, Director

Carter Center, Paige Alexander, CEO

Center for Peace Building and Democracy in Liberia (CEPEBUD-Liberia), Florence N. Flomo, Executive Director

Committee to Protect Journalists, Jodie Ginsberg, President

Consortium on Gender, Security and Human Rights, Carol Cohn, Director

Darfur Diaspora Association Group in the United Kingdom, Abdallah Idriss, Director

Darfur Women Action Group, Niemat Ahmadi, Founder and President

DefendDefenders, Hassan Shire, Executive Director

EG Justice, Tutu Alicante, Executive Director

Freedom House, Michael J. Abramowitz, President

Genocide Alert, Gregor Hoffman, Chairman

George W. Bush Institute, David Kramer, Executive Director

Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, Savita Pawnday, Executive Director

Global Survivors Fund, Dennis Mukwege, President

GOAL, Siobhán Walsh, CEO

HIAS, Mark Hetfield, President & CEO

HUDO Centre, Bushra Gamar, Executive Director

Human Rights Watch, Tirana Hassan, Executive Director

iACT, Sara-Christine Dallain, Executive Director

Institute for Genocide and Mass Atrocity Prevention at Binghamton University, Kerry Whigham, Co-Director

InterAction, Anne Lynam Goddard, Interim President and CEO

International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Eleonore Morel, CEO

International Rescue Committee, David Miliband, President & CEO

Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights, Felice Gaer, Director

Legal Action Worldwide, Antonia Mulvey, Founder and Executive Director

MADRE, Yifat Susskind, Executive Director

Mercy Corps, Tjada D’Oyen McKenna, Chief Executive Officer

Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies at Concordia University, Kyle Matthews, Executive Director

Never Again Coalition, Lauren Fortgang, Director

No Business with Genocide, Simon Billenness, Director

Nobel Women’s Initiative, Maria Butler, Executive Director

Nonviolent Peaceforce, Tiffany Easthom, Executive Director

Norwegian Refugee Council, Jan Egeland, Secretary General

Open Society Foundations, Mark Malloch-Brown, President

OutRight International, Maria Sjödin, Executive Director

Physicians for Human Rights, Saman Zia-Zarifi, Executive Director

Plan International, Stephen Omollo, CEO

Project Expedite Justice, Cynthia Tai, Executive Director

Public International Law & Policy Group, Paul R. Williams, President

Refugees International, Jeremy Konyndyk, President

Regional Centre for Training and Development of Civil Society, Mutaal Girshab, Director General

Society for Threatened Peoples, Roman Kühn, Director

Sudan Transparency and Policy Tracker, Suliman Baldo, Executive Director

Sudanese American Public Affairs Association, Fareed Zein, Board Chairman

The Sentry, John Prendergast, Co-Founder

Torture Abolition and Survivors Support Coalition (TASSC), Aymen Tabir, Executive Director

US-Educated Sudanese Association (USESA), Samah Salman, President

Vital Voices, Alyse Nelson, President & CEO

World Federalist Movement Canada, Alexandre MacIsaac, Executive Director

World Federalist Movement/Institute for Global Policy (WFM/IGP), Amy Oloo, Consulting Executive Director

Open Letter

NGOs to UN Human Rights Council: Extend Mandate of Commission on Ethiopia (ICHREE)

PHR joins global coalition of civil society to call upon the UN Human Rights Council to extend the mandate of the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia (“the Commission,” or ICHREE) for a further term of one year, until September 2024.


To Permanent Representatives of Member and Observer States of the United Nations Human Rights Council 

** September 2023

54th session of the UN Human Rights Council: Ethiopia – Renew the mandate of the ICHREE

Excellencies,

Ahead of the Human Rights Council’s 54th regular session (September 11- October 12, 2023), we, the undersigned civil society and human rights organizations, are writing to urge your delegation to ensure the Human Rights Council adopts a resolution that extends the mandate of the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia (“the Commission,” or ICHREE) for a further term of one year, until September 2024.

In light of the ongoing dire human rights situation in Ethiopia, which requires the Human Rights Council’s continued attention, it is clear that now is not the time to change the Council’s approach and reduce independent investigations and evidence gathering work in the country.

The ICHREE has carried out essential work despite the Ethiopian government’s repeated attempts to obstruct its investigations, including by refusing to cooperate with and grant ICHREE’s investigators access to conflict-affected areas. The Ethiopian government also attempted to get the mechanism defunded and prematurely terminated. Despite all the challenges, the ICHREE presented its first report in September 2022 and found reasonable grounds to believe that all parties to the conflict in northern Ethiopia had committed war crimes since fighting erupted in Tigray in November 2020. It also found that some of the crimes it documented were ongoing and underscored the need for an independent, impartial mechanism to address ongoing violations and support accountability efforts.

In November 2022, the Ethiopian federal government and Tigrayan authorities signed a cessation of hostilities agreement. While the agreement ended active hostilities in Tigray, and restored some aspects of civilian life, serious human rights abuses against civilians persist in violation of the agreement. In Tigray, Eritrean Defense Forces have continued to subject women and girls to rape and other forms of sexual violence, while obstructing humanitarian access in areas under their control. Local authorities and Amhara forces in Western Tigray Zone continued an ethnic cleansing campaign against Tigrayans at least until March 2023. An August statement from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights suggests that arrests, detentions, and displacement of Tigrayans in the Zone are continuing.

Since April 2023, clashes between the Ethiopian military and the local Fano militia broke out across the Amhara region, with media outlets reporting abuses such as unlawful killings, including of humanitarian staff. That month, federal authorities arrested journalists reporting on the unrest and imposed a mobile internet ban on the region. The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights found that at least 183 people have been killed in fighting since July.  As clashes intensified, the government on August 4 declared a sweeping state of emergency in the Amhara region, and said that the state of emergency could be extended to any “area of the country as deemed necessary”. The emergency law grants authorities the power to carry out arrests without a warrant, impose curfews, restrict movement, and ban public assemblies. Under previous states of emergency, authorities have carried out large-scale, ethnically motivated arrests and prolonged detention without charge or trial. Since this state of emergency was implemented, authorities have arrested opposition figures and reportedly conducted mass arrests outside of the Amhara region, in Ethiopia’s capital Addis Ababa, at times holding detainees in informal sites such as schools.

In Oromia, government forces and the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA) armed group have been fighting in parts of the region since 2019, resulting in serious abuses against civilians, including Oromo and minority communities.

After the signing of the cessation of hostilities agreement, the Ethiopian government committed to carrying out national consultations on a transitional justice process with the stated aim of achieving truth, justice, and reconciliation.  

Our organizations remain concerned that the national transitional justice process, as set out in the government’s green paper, has from the onset emphasized reconciliation over accountability, truth, and redress for victims. To date, government initiatives have not addressed serious concerns over the capacity, transparency, and independence of Ethiopian investigative and judicial institutions to effectively investigate, and where sufficient evidence exists, prosecute crimes under international law.

The November 2021 joint report by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission also raised concerns that the investigations carried out by Ethiopian institutions did not sufficiently comply with international standards and did not match the scope and breadth of the human rights abuses committed in the country. A government taskforce established in response to that report has still not released its findings into the events that have occurred in Tigray. The task force’s September 2022 report referred to a handful of prosecutions of Ethiopian soldiers before military courts, without any clarity about the rank of the accused, the nature of the crimes, or the outcome of those cases. The task force has not provided an update on investigations and prosecutions of Ethiopian regional forces or Eritrean Defense Forces.

The ICHREE’s March oral update to the Human Rights Council, presented by its chairperson, the eminent African jurist, Mr. Mohamed Chande Othman, also raised concerns about “the lack of [domestic] pathways for accountability for serious violations committed by Eritrean forces” in Ethiopia.

Against the backdrop of the human rights crisis in Ethiopia, and the need for thorough, independent, impartial, and transparent investigations, it is clear that the mandate of the ICHREE remains critical. Renewal of the mandate would also allow the Council to:

Ensure the continued impartial and independent documentation of human rights violations and abuses, which should not be delayed while the government initiates the longer-term process of institutional and legislative reforms to strengthen domestic judicial institutions and address accountability gaps;

Ensure ongoing independent and public reporting and debates, including on domestic accountability measures. While the Ethiopian government has accepted human rights monitoring activities by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission, it is important that their findings also be publicly reported. Interactive dialogues at the Human Rights Council provide the only regular space for independent public reporting and debates on human rights developments in the country; and

Ensure the preservation of evidence of crimes under international law and the safe participation of victims and survivors in the investigations with a view to transferring such documentation responsibly to independent and competent judicial authorities in the future. 

At its 54th session, the Council should adopt a resolution that extends the ICHREE’s mandate for one year to allow it to continue its work and address the magnitude, gravity, and scope of the human rights violations and abuses, some of which may constitute crimes under international law, committed by all parties to the conflict in Ethiopia.

We thank you for your attention to these pressing issues and stand ready to provide your delegation with further information as required.

Sincerely,

  1. Alliance of Civil Society Organizations of Tigray (ACSOT), Network of 72 CSOs in Tigray
  2. African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies (ACJPS)
  3. Africans for the Horn of Africa
  4. African Network against Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances (ANEKED)
  5. Amnesty International
  6. Arakan Rohingya Society for Peace and Human Rights
  7. Association pour la Défense des Droits de la Personne et des Libertés Publiques  (ADL)
  8. Association Tchadienne pour la Promotion et Défense des Droits de l’Homme (ATPDH)
  9. Association Nigérienne pour la Défense des Droits de l’Homme (ANDDH)
  10. Association of Tigrayan Communities in Canada
  11. Association of Tigrayans in Denmark
  12. Association of Tigrayans in the Netherlands
  13. Association of Tigrayans in France
  14. Association of Tigrayan Women in Sweden/TKFAS
  15. Atrocities Watch Africa
  16. The Botswana Centre for Human Rights (DITSHWANELO) – – Gaborone Botswana
  17. Center for the Advancement of Human Rights and Democracy (CARD)
  18. The Civil Society Human Rights Advocacy Platform of Liberia
  19. Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW)
  20. Dekna Foundation
  21. Education and Wisdom Development for Rohingya Women (EWDRW)
  22. Ethiopian Canadians for Peace
  23. Fédération Internationale pour les droits Humains (FIDH)
  24. Forum Mekete Italy
  25. Friends of Tigray
  26. Giving Back to Our Roots
  27. Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect
  28. The Global Society of Tigray Scholars and Professionals (GSTS)
  29. Health Professionals Network for Tigray (HPN4Tigray)
  30. Human Rights Concern – Eritrea (HRCE)
  31. Human Rights First (Ethiopia)
  32. Human Rights Watch
  33. Irob Anina Civil Society (IACS)
  34. Lawyers for Human Rights
  35. Legal Action Worldwide (LAW)
  36. Legacy Tigray
  37. Mekete Tigray UK
  38. Observatoire des droits de l’Homme au Rwanda (ODHR)
  39. Omna Tigray
  40. One Day Seyoum
  41. Organisation Guinéenne de Défense des Droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen (OGDH) – Guinea 
  42. Organization for Justice and Accountability in the Horn of Africa (OJAH) 
  43. Oromo Legacy Leadership & Advocacy Association (OLLAA)
  44. Pan African Lawyers Association (PALU)
  45. Physicians for Human Rights
  46. Rescue Tigrayan Rape Victims  
  47. Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights (RFKHR)
  48. Rohingya Student Network (RSN)
  49. Rohingya Union for Women Education and Development (RUWED)
  50. Rohingya Women Association for Education and Development (RWAED)
  51. Samarbeidsfora for Norsk-Tigrayananere (4S-N-T) Norway
  52. Security and Justice for Tigrayans (SJT)
  53. Sudanese Human Rights Monitor (SHRM)
  54. Tigray Action Committee (TAC)
  55. Tigray Advocacy & Development -United Kingdom
  56. Tigray Human Rights Forum
  57. Tigray Youth Association in Italy
  58. Tigray Youth Network UK
  59. Tsilalna Tigray
  60. Union of Tigrayans in Belgium
  61. United Tegaru Canada (UTC)
  62. United Women of the Horn (UWH)
  63. Victims Advocates International (VAI)
  64. Women’s Association for Women & Victims’ Empowerment (WAVE)-Gambia
  65. Zimbabwe Human Rights Association
Report

Broken Promises: Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Before and After the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement in Tigray, Ethiopia

Executive Summary

The conflict in Tigray, Ethiopia between the government of Ethiopia and the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), with involvement from Eritrean military forces and numerous ethno-regional militia groups, has been marked by widespread conflict-related sexual violence. Reports of conflict-related sexual violence as a significant element of the conflict surfaced both before and after the signing of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement (CoHA) in November 2022 by the government of Ethiopia and the TPLF. This report – prepared by a joint research team composed of professionals with medical and public health training and expertise in Ethiopia and Physicians from Human Rights (PHR) – finds that, since the start of the conflict in November 2020 until June 2023, military actors have perpetrated brutal and widespread acts of conflict-related sexual violence in Tigray and that these acts have not ceased following the signing of the CoHA.

A medical and human rights research team reviewed 305 randomly selected medical records from multiple health facilities in Tigray, Ethiopia, with the goal of documenting types and patterns of conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence perpetrated against civilians in Tigray between November 2020 through June 2023. Of the 305 records reviewed, 304 records included reports of conflict-related sexual violence, overwhelmingly affecting women and girls, with survivors of conflict-related sexual violence ranging in age from eight to 69.

Key Findings

The medical records reviewed paint a stark picture of the systematic and widespread infliction of conflict-related sexual violence by government armed forces and militias. All parties to the conflict failed to prevent and halt conflict-related sexual violence and to ensure that survivors are able to report and seek care for the devastating injuries caused by these acts.

Sexual violence was often perpetrated by groups, and at times involved captivity and use of weapons. Analysis of this data revealed that rape committed by multiple perpetrators accounted for the majority of documented acts (76%; n=233), followed by rape committed by a single perpetrator (22%; n=68). The incidents examined in this review most commonly were carried out in groups, with a median of three perpetrators. It is noteworthy that there were 10 records in which patients reported experiencing captivity during the occurrence of multiple-perpetrator rape, consistent with enslavement and sexual slavery. The incidents frequently involved perpetrators who used weapons or other forms of violence concurrently with sexual-violence acts. Several accounts also described the murder of family members, including children, before, during, or after rape.

Survivors identified perpetrators as largely belonging to Eritrean or Ethiopian armed forces. Most commonly, survivors identified perpetrators as speaking the Tigrigna language (66%), which is spoken in both Eritrea and Tigray. Survivors also largely identified perpetrators as appearing to belong to military and paramilitary groups (96%) and were previously unknown to the survivors (99%). While not all records indicated the affiliation of perpetrators, in 143 instances survivors identified at least one perpetrator as being from the Eritrean military, which reportedly operated in alignment with Ethiopian government forces during the 2020-2022 conflict period.8 30 percent of perpetrators were identified as speaking Amharic. In 16 instances survivors identified perpetrators as being part of the Ethiopian military. More specific data about other identifying features (e.g., color of military uniform, insignia, identifying speech patterns such as accents) was not available in these records.

Survivors have serious health needs from conflict-related sexual violence, but face delays in reporting and seeking medical care. The medical records reflect serious physical and psychological consequences of conflict-related sexual violence, both short- and long-term, including mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (13%) and depression (17%), unintended pregnancy self-reported by the survivor (8%), and reproductive organ injuries and disorders (11%), including urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, abnormal uterine bleeding, uterine prolapse, chronic pelvic pain, and fistulas. Records show that in multiple instances, conflict-related sexual violence may have resulted in pregnancy (27% of patients tested for pregnancy at the time of examination were positive) or contraction of HIV (11% of patients tested for HIV were positive).

The data also showed significant delays in seeking medical care. There was a median period of five months between the reported incident and survivors presenting at health facilities. Although it is unclear what caused the delays (e.g., stigma, fear for one’s safety, ongoing conflict affecting transportation and access to health facilities), such delays suggest an underreporting of cases of conflict-related sexual violence.

Conflict-related sexual violence is ongoing, even following the CoHA. The medical records reviewed showed many instances of conflict-related sexual violence occurring after the November 2022 CoHA: 169 incidents of conflict-related sexual violence occurred before the signing of the CoHA in November 2022 and 128 incidents occurred after November 2022. The scale and nature of these violations has not materially changed since the peace agreement was signed, except for the notable fact that 95 percent of conflict-related sexual violence experienced by children and adolescents under 18 years old occurred following the signing of the CoHA.

Conclusions

The scale of cases, pattern of incidents, and description of perpetrators suggest that these incidents of conflict-related sexual violence were both widespread and systematic. The findings of this investigation are consistent with other publicly available reports and are indicative of the use of rape and other forms of sexual violence as a tool of war against civilian populations to terrorize communities and inflict grave harms.

This data points to the high likelihood that military forces, likely associated with the Ethiopian and Eritrean governments, have caused serious violations of human rights and committed atrocity crimes such as war crimes (e.g., torture and humiliating or degrading treatment, rape and sexual violence, sexual slavery) and crimes against humanity (e.g., persecution, torture, enslavement and sexual slavery, rape) as defined in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and in international jurisprudence. These violations have caused survivors significant harm, leading to an urgent need for medical and psychosocial support.

It is imperative that the international community actively ensure that perpetrators of these crimes and human rights abuses are held to account and that survivors can receive both access to justice as well as necessary medical aid and reparations to support recovery and rehabilitation. Particularly in light of the deteriorating security situation in Amhara and concerns about atrocity prevention, it is critical to send a clear message that there will be accountability for human rights abuses. The research findings unequivocally indicate that there is a need for ongoing independent monitoring and documentation to ensure survivors can report the abuses they suffered, have their experiences documented, and have evidence for accountability gathered in a timely manner and properly preserved.

Recommendations

While Ethiopia is mandated to undertake a transitional justice process under the terms of the CoHA, benchmarks for monitoring have yet to be released publicly and it is unclear whether accountability will be incorporated as of the time of publication of this report. The findings of our report point to past and ongoing involvement of forces aligned with the Ethiopian government in carrying out conflict-related sexual violence. Consequently, there is significant reason to doubt the credibility of investigations, documentation, and accountability and justice processes left solely to the oversight of the national government. In light of these findings, which are being published as the risk of future human rights violations is increasing due to intensifying conflict in other parts of Ethiopia, there is an urgent need for international and regional action in addition to national efforts to ensure credible monitoring, documentation, investigations, prosecutions, and justice for the grave violations committed.

This report is being released at a time when several independent investigative mechanisms seem likely to be closed, despite evidence of ongoing violence in violation of the CoHA and international human rights and humanitarian law. Following the CoHA, there have been serious concerns about the status of the UN International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia (ICHREE)– the Human Rights Council-mandated mechanism for investigation and documentation of human rights violations and atrocity crimes in Ethiopia. The Commission is expected to provide a summary report to the UN Human Rights Council in September 2023, but there are strong indications that ICHREE’s mandate may not be renewed beyond that time, in part due to pressure from the Ethiopian government to defer to national mechanisms including the CoHA-mandated transitional justice process. Similarly, the Commission of Inquiry (COI) established by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights to investigate violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law and identify perpetrators for purposes of pursuing justice and accountability also faced opposition by the government of Ethiopia. The COI’s mandate was recently terminated, prior even to the publication of a single report of its findings and recommendations.

Based on the data presented in this report, Physicians for Human Rights and Ethiopian partners make the following recommendations to international, regional, national, and local actors: 

  1. Guarantee and support impartial documentation and accountability for serious human rights violations and atrocity crimes that have occurred; 
  2. Ensure unfettered, continued independent and impartial monitoring of and reporting on ongoing conflict-related sexual violence, including the situation of children and adolescents; 
  3. Ensure a credible and benchmarked transitional justice process that meaningfully responds to the perspectives and needs of survivors of human rights violations including conflict-related sexual violence; and 
  4. Facilitate access to physical and mental health services and other forms of rehabilitation for all survivors of conflict-related sexual violence, without discrimination.

To realize these recommendations, we call for the following measures by specific actors:

To the Ethiopian government and federal regional authorities:

  • Rigorously and immediately implement all recommendations of the UN International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia in their reports to the UN Human Rights Council (A/HRC/51/46);
  • Cooperate fully with investigations by all UN, regional, local, and international non-governmental human rights monitors, including to ensure unrestricted access to all regions of Ethiopia and protection from reprisal for their work;
  • Direct the Ministry of Justice and the Ethiopian Inter-Ministerial Task Force on Accountability and Redress of Violations to suspend, investigate, and bring to justice members of Ethiopia’s armed forces who have overseen or participated in violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law, including those violations and abuses that may amount to war crimes or crimes against humanity, in accordance with international and regional standards and national law;
  • Ensure that survivors of sexual violence, and communities disproportionately impacted by sexual violence, are meaningfully engaged in designing transitional justice efforts, that they can participate without risk of retaliation, and that their perspectives, safety, and needs are prioritized;
  • Allow unfettered access to humanitarian aid, including medical services, without discrimination, including to members of vulnerable populations and specifically survivors of conflict-related sexual violence; and
  • Ensure appropriate redress and reparations for and provide free, timely, and adequate medical, psychosocial, and legal services to all survivors of conflict-related sexual violence without discrimination, fully respecting their privacy and ensuring their protection against reprisals.

To all parties to the conflict, including the governments of Ethiopia and Eritrea:

  • Halt all forms of violence, including rape, enslavement and sexual slavery, and other forms of conflict-related sexual violence; protect civilians; and condemn sexual and gender-based violence, as mandated under international human rights law and humanitarian law as well as agreed to by the parties to the CoHA;
  • Publicly condemn and issue orders to prevent and cease immediately all abuses, including all forms of sexual and gender-based violence, and facilitate investigation and prosecution of these abuses and justice for survivors;
  • Exclude from any peace agreement the provision of amnesty or immunity for serious violations of international law; and
  • Comply with the obligation of each party to a conflict to allow and facilitate the delivery of impartial humanitarian relief consignments for civilians in need of supplies essential to their survival.

To the international community:

  • Actively support the renewal of the mandate of the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia (ICHREE);
  • Ensure well-resourced, ongoing impartial, independent documentation of and public reporting on human rights and international humanitarian law violations since the onset of hostilities on November 3, 2020, including by supporting a succession plan for ICHREE should the mandate not be renewed. This includes a plan for preservation of evidence marshaled by ICHREE as well as the designation of a similarly empowered investigative mechanism;
  • Promptly support the investigation of and accountability for those credibly implicated in serious rights abuses in Ethiopia under international law, including through universal jurisdiction;
  • Condition non-humanitarian funding for the government of Ethiopia on its demonstrable, measurable progress in providing accountability and justice for atrocity crimes, including public acceptance of this commitment and the establishment of clear benchmarks and timelines for implementation;
  • Monitor and ensure full compliance with the commitments and obligations agreed to in the CoHA;
  • Ensure that domestic accountability and justice processes are only endorsed if they are impartial, transparent, non-discriminatory, inclusive of survivors of the conflict, including survivors of sexual violence, and ensure their safety and rights in engaging such processes;
  • Fund and provide technical support to strengthen knowledge of the transitional justice process among survivors and build capacity among health, law enforcement, and justice sector actors to support investigations and prosecutions of conflict-related sexual violence and facilitate access to remedies and reparations for survivors of sexual violence; and
  • Prioritize survivor-centered, trauma-informed care and rehabilitation for survivors of conflict-related sexual violence in humanitarian support to Ethiopia, with specialized care for children and adolescents.

To the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission Joint Investigation Team (JIT): 

  • Ensure that all parties to the conflict implement in particular recommendations #5 and #6 of the JIT’s 2021 report, specifically to “[e]nd all forms of sexual violence against women and girls, men and boys, including targeting of civilians on the basis of their gender or ethnicity;” and “[i]ssue clear, public, and unequivocal instructions to all armed forces and groups, that all forms of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) are prohibited and punishable on the basis of direct and command responsibility, including superiors who ordered or failed to prevent or stop violations.”

To the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights:

  • Promptly reconsider the decision to terminate the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry and ensure that its mandate concludes, at least, with a report of its findings and recommendations.
Other

Submission to the United Nations Universal Periodic Review of the Russian Federation

Summary

eyeWitness to Atrocities, Insecurity Insight, Media Initiative for Human Rights, Physicians for Human Rights, and the Ukrainian Healthcare Center (together, the submitting organizations) jointly submit this report to inform the examination of the Russian Federation (Russia) during its Universal Periodic Review (UPR). This submission focuses on international humanitarian and human rights law concerns relating to health care since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022.


On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, violating international law and drawing widespread condemnation from the international community. The conflict has been characterized by attacks on civilians and civilian objects, including the health care system. These attacks constitute violations of applicable international humanitarian law (IHL) rules and international human rights law, including war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity. They also have had a devastating impact on the fulfillment of the human right to health of the inhabitants of Ukraine.

Specifically, this submission raises the following concerns:

  • Violations of IHL: Deliberate and indiscriminate attacks on Ukraine’s health care system;
  • Violations of human rights in Russia-controlled territories: Torture and ill-treatment of those in captivity, including health care professionals, and deprivation of adequate medical care;
  • Impact of Russia’s violations on Ukraine’s ability to ensure the respect, protection and fulfillment of the human right to health of individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction.

On November 13, 2023, Russia is scheduled for examination at the fourth cycle of UPR. In addition to launching an illegal war since the third cycle of the UPR in 2018, Russia has largely failed to implement prior recommendations relevant to the scope of this submission, including to: accede to the Optional Protocol to the United Nations Convention against Torture, ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, end its illegal occupation of Crimea, cooperate fully and ensure access to Crimea and other occupied Ukrainian territory to all international human rights mechanisms, investigate and prosecute allegations of torture and inhuman treatment in custody, and release unlawfully detained Ukrainian citizens

Statements

PHR Executive Director Saman Zia-Zarifi Delivers Statement on Ukraine at the 53rd session of UN Human Rights Council

UN Human Rights Council 53rd Session, Oral Statement on Ukraine (res. 47/22) and interim report of the Secretary General on human rights in Crimea (GA res. 77/229), 12 July 2023

Speaker: Saman Zia-Zarifi, Executive Director

Oral Statement as Delivered:

Physicians for Human Rights wishes to echo the High Commissioner’s concerns about Russian attacks on civilian targets in Ukraine. In the last 15 months, almost 1,000 attacks have been perpetrated against Ukraine’s health system, amounting to an average of two attacks per day. These include destruction of hospitals and ambulances and the arbitrary detention and torture of medical professionals. At least 56 attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure have severely limited the ability of health care facilities to remain operational. In 2022, Ukraine accounted for over one-third of all reported attacks on health globally. Russia’s war in Ukraine has worsened health, exacerbated the demographic crisis, reduced affordability of medicines, and disrupted access to health care in both liberated and temporarily occupied territories.

Russian armed forces have destroyed Ukraine’s health system both deliberately and indiscriminately. We concur with the UN Commission of Inquiry’s conclusion that these attacks constitute war crimes and potentially crimes against humanity. The overwhelming evidence demands justice, including reparations for the $2.5 billion in estimated damages to the health care system.

Mr. High Commissioner, what progress has been made in investigating and prosecuting these attacks on health care in Ukraine?

Report

Mobilizing Health Workers to Safeguard Rights

Physicians for Human Rights 2022 Annual Report

What We Do

For more than 35 years, Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) has worked at the intersection of medicine, science, and law to end human suffering, save lives, and secure justice and universal human rights for all.

PHR mobilizes the medical community to defend rights and advance justice. Our global network of thousands of health professionals, lawyers, and human rights researchers and activists has worked across five continents to ensure accountability for attacks on health care infrastructure and personnel and for sexual violence in conflict zones, end torture and ill-treatment, speak out for the right to protest safely, halt the use of excessive force by police and security forces, and safeguard the rights and health of asylum seekers.

  • We train health, legal, and law enforcement professionals to document evidence of human rights abuses and to work together to bring that evidence to court, hold violators accountable, and secure justice for victims and survivors.
  • We investigate mass atrocities and advocate to protect health care facilities and personnel from attack.
  • We pioneer innovative, survivor- centered, and trauma-informed tools and are leaders in creating global standards that strengthen justice and accountability.

Our evidence is used by international and local justice mechanisms, United Nations bodies, policymakers, and journalists to bring human rights abusers to justice, prosecute war crimes, reform policies and practices that undermine human rights, secure reparations for survivors, and spur action in the face of growing rights violations.

Explore the Annual Report below or download it here.

Female nurses and police officers preparing for an International Women’s Day parade in front of the Court House in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. PHR has worked for years forging partnerships between medical, law enforcement, legal, and justice professionals to document cases of sexual violence and improve access to justice for survivors. Photo: DeDe Dunevant/PHR

Working to End Attacks on Health Workers and Hospitals

PHR has documented attacks on health care since our founding. We expose the persecution, torture, and killing of health professionals, the bombing of hospitals and ambulances, the obstruction of access to health care, and the blockading of medical aid to populations in conflict zones.

We use our investigations and data to spotlight violations, generate evidence to support justice processes, and advocate at the highest levels for protection of medical facilities and health professionals on the front lines. We galvanize the global medical community to act in solidarity with their colleagues under fire around the world.

“These findings should be a wake-up call for the global community to act now to end impunity for wanton violence against health workers, in Ukraine and around the world.”

Christian De Vos, PHR Research and Investigations Director

With the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, PHR and our partners on the ground launched a rapid response investigation into widespread attacks by Russian forces on Ukraine’s health system. Together, we documented at least 707 attacks on health care in Ukraine in 2022 alone – the most comprehensive dataset to date of these egregious violations of international law – and are sharing this crucial evidence with justice mechanisms building prosecutions of war crimes and crimes against humanity.


“In Syria’s devastating war, women pay the highest price. The fundamental human right to health – including being able to deliver a baby safely, to bring new life to the world – has been routinely violated in northwest Syria, where bombs have rained down on hospitals, and healthcare workers have been persecuted.”

Dr. Houssam al-Nahhas, PHR Middle East and North Africa Researcher

PHR has been documenting attacks on health care in Syria since the start of the conflict there in 2011: more than 600 assaults on medical facilities and the killing of almost 1,000 health care professionals. Fully 90 percent of these illegal attacks were perpetrated by the Syrian government and/or its Russian allies. We have published more than a dozen reports on the horrific impacts of these attacks on health, most recently on how Syrian women and girls have suffered from the loss of access to sexual and reproductive health care. Read the report.

  • 0

    Medical Professionals

    At least 949 medical professionals have been killed in Syria from 2011 through March 2024.

  • 0%

    Personnel Deaths

    PHR has assessed that at least 88% of medical personnel killings were committed by Syrian government forces and their Russian allies.


Myanmar

In Myanmar, we exposed how the country’s armed forces violently attacked health care facilities and arrested, tortured, and killed medical workers protesting the military coup. With Myanmar effectively closed to the outside world, PHR and our partners were one of the few go-to sources of critical data on these crimes.

Türkiye

PHR has long spoken out about the Turkish government’s repression of medical professionals who expose the health harms of human rights violations. 2022 saw a further crackdown, when the renowned leader of the Turkish Medical Association – forensic pathologist, anti-torture activist, and PHR Advisory Council Member Dr. Sebnem Korur Fincancı – was again arbitrarily detained on terror-related charges.
PHR led an international coalition that ultimately helped secure Dr. Fincancı’s release. We stand firmly with these courageous health professionals and reiterate our call for Türkiye’s government to end its campaign of intimidation, silencing, and punishment.

“PHR’s reports on the health consequences of family separation show that all four criteria for torture were met. The trauma from these separations did not disappear when families were finally reunited. As a perpetrator of state torture, the U.S. government is obligated to provide prompt and effective redress to survivors, including psychological rehabilitative services.”

Dr. Ranit Mishori, PHR Senior Medical Advisor

For more than three decades, PHR has worked to protect the rights of people fleeing violence and persecution. Every year, hundreds of PHR-trained clinicians conduct pro bono forensic physical and psychological evaluations of asylum seekers that support their immigration cases so they can be granted protection in the United States. We also investigate and document persecution and ill-treatment of asylum seekers and migrants on both sides of the U.S.- Mexico border, including the terrible harms of forced family separation by U.S. officials – and we use our data to advocate for a more just and humane immigration system.

Success

Asylum seekers and other immigrants who obtained forensic medical evaluations from PHR volunteer clinicians between 2008 and 2018 were twice as likely to be granted protection in the United States as applicants who did not get evaluations.

  • 0

    Partner medical schools

  • 0

    Pro bono forensic evaluations of asylum seekers conducted by PHR volunteer clinicians in 2022

  • 0

    Volunteer clinicians in PHR’s Asylum Network

Success

Leveraging our growing network of more than 2,200 volunteer clinicians across the United States, PHR conducted pro bono forensic evaluations for 710 asylum seekers, a record high for the program. We increased our partner medical schools to 22, including in high-need areas and along the U.S.-Mexico border.

“This is just a tiny fraction of what the world is experiencing on a daily basis. The vast majority of injuries — even significant severe injuries — go unreported.”

Dr. Rohini J. Haar PHR Medical Advisor

PHR’s researchers and investigators use the power of science and medicine to expose police violence, state torture, and the excessive use of force by government security forces against peaceful protesters worldwide. We debunk pseudoscience that excuses police violence and advocate to stop the use of chemical and dangerous crowd-control weapons.

Success

PHR produced a landmark report on the alleged syndrome “excited delirium,” which is disproportionately used in the United States in cases involving Black men to absolve police of responsibility for deaths in custody. Following our publication, the American Academy of Emergency Medicine disavowed the term, the National Association of Medical Examiners reversed its endorsement of “excited delirium,” and the Bay Area Rapid Transit Police Department in California removed the term from its policy manual. Our work has informed police oversight and reform efforts in city and state governments across the United States. We helped secure important legal victories and compensation for survivors of police violence in New York, resulting in one of the highest reparations settlements ever awarded per person in NYC, and we continue powerful advocacy so that policymakers, medical associations, and law enforcement end the use of “excited delirium.”

“One crucial step … towards preventing future deaths in police custody is ensuring that baseless medical diagnoses do not impede possible treatment, obscure the true cause of death, or provide cover to those responsible.”

Dr. Altaf Saadi, PHR Asylum Network Member; Joanna Naples-Mitchell, PHR U.S. Research Advisor; Dr. Brianna da Silva Bhatia, PHR COVID-19 Health Strategist; Dr. Michele Heisler, PHR Medical Director

“We cannot move forward unless we reckon with the past. In this regard, the survivors of past election-related violence should be helped to obtain justice and accountability.”

Naitore Nyamu-Mathenge, PHR Head of the Kenya Office

Every year, tens of thousands of adults and children experience sexual violence during armed conflict. A key reason for impunity is the lack of high-quality forensic evidence and survivor- centered justice processes.

Since 2011, PHR has tackled this crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Iraq, and Kenya through innovative technology, hands- on training, and forging powerful networks of health, law enforcement, and legal professionals that are helping secure justice for survivors.

Success

PHR is bridging innovation and forensic evidence collection with our award- winning MediCapt app, which enables clinicians to securely document, store, and transmit evidence of sexual violence. More than twice as effective at producing high-quality data than paper-based forms, this court-admissible evidence strengthens investigations, increases prosecutions, and helps ensure that perpetrators of sexual violence can be tried and convicted for their crimes. We have continued expanding MediCapt’s use in Kenya and the DRC in order to reach many more clinicians and the sexual violence survivors they serve.

Watch: MediCapt at HEAL Africa Hospital in DRC

In landmark cases in Kenya and the DRC, PHR and our partners have helped win significant legal victories for child and adult victims and survivors of sexual violence. We advocate tirelessly to change policies and practices and to ensure that survivors are compensated for the harms they’ve suffered.

PHR has strengthened capacity to document the psychological trauma of sexual violence and provide mental health care to survivors. After years of extensive work, we celebrated an important victory in June 2022 when Kenya’s Senate passed a law that safeguards the rights of people with mental illnesses and promotes a holistic approach to mental health, including critical mental health services for survivors of sexual violence.

PHR has trained more than 2,000 health care professionals in the DRC, Ethiopia, Iraq, and Kenya to provide survivor- centered, trauma-informed care and to document forensic evidence of sexual violence. These PHR-trained experts have gone on to train hundreds more professionals. In partnership with Kenyan medical schools, PHR is supporting the training of thousands of new medical students in forensic documentation and survivor-centered care.


“I’m really optimistic that what we are going to see in the U.S. … is positive reform and … a stronger legal framework than we have in Roe v. Wade where we can really think about international human rights and we can see an abortion framework that’s grounded in equality and not just privacy.”

Payal Shah, PHR Program on Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones Director

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade, PHR is stepping up our advocacy for reproductive rights and justice. We have begun new research and advocacy with partners on the health and human rights harms of abortion restrictions and the “dual loyalty” crisis clinicians face when they are forced to deviate from established standards of care, putting their patients at risk and violating clinicians’ medical and ethical obligations.

We’re mobilizing health professionals and building networks with reproductive justice advocates to document the health and rights harms caused by abortion bans on both patients and providers, and to speak out for accountability and reform.


PHR was the galvanizing force behind the team of international experts who, in 1999, created the Istanbul Protocol, UN guidelines that are the gold standard for conducting effective investigations into allegations of torture. In 2022, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights published the new edition of the Istanbul Protocol, the culmination of a multiyear effort spearheaded by PHR that brought together 180 experts from 51 countries. The new edition provides critical guidance to States on how to fulfill their treaty obligations to investigate, prosecute, and punish torture under international law.

Watch: Next Steps for the Global Anti-Torture Movement


The 2023 PHR Student Conference brought together more than 125 future doctors, social workers, lawyers, public health workers, and specialists from many other disciplines – from 24 institutions across 16 states – to discuss how to put their skills to work to protect human rights. Photo: Keith Melong, University of Michigan

Inspiring the Next Generation of Health and Human Rights Activists

PHR is deeply committed to growing the ranks of new health professional human rights activists. Our Student Program has 90 chapters at medical schools across the United States and around the world, where we connect medical and health students with the resources and skills to advocate for health and human rights locally, nationally, and globally.



“None of this would be possible without your unstinting support. I want to thank you for your partnership and belief in our work. We in turn pledge to continue to provide PHR’s unique combination of science and advocacy in defense of human rights.”

Saman Zia-Zarifi, PHR Executive Director
Multimedia

“Dual Loyalty” and U.S. Abortion Bans

Clinicians Caught between Patients’ Rights, Ethical Obligations, & Restrictive Laws

Abortion is health care, and abortion rights are human rights that must be guaranteed without discrimination. In the United States, the Supreme Court’s rollback of the right to abortion in 2022 has led to widespread violations of human rights. These restrictive new laws put clinicians in an impossible situation, also known as “dual loyalty”, forcing them to navigate the rights and health care needs of their patients midst the bans on the provision of full reproductive care.

Featuring:

Payal Shah, JD, Director, Program on Sexual Violence in Conflict

Colleen Denny, MD FACOG, Ethics Committee Member, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology


Produced by Hannah Dunphy, PHR

Produced and edited by Gabriel Baron

Get Updates from PHR